Many woke up this morning in shock, outraged, saddened, and numb. One of their heroes was assassinated moments after making a flippant remark about the number of transgender mass shooters there have been in the US. THIS was not a mass shooting event, though a mass shooting did occur one state over, in Colorado. No, in this instance, a lone gunman, with a high powered rifle, murdered Mr. Kirk. As of this writing the perpetrator has not been apprehended, though authorities believe they located the weapon and questioned two people of interest before releasing them later in the day.
Unsurprisingly, Charlie Kirk’s death is already being politicized. (And no, it is not a “distraction” from the Epstein mess; most can hold more than one issue in tension at a time). The president, took the lead, ordered flags to be flown at half mast, and ironically pointed an angry finger at the left while decrying violence predicate by political outrage. Many Democratic figures, including: Biden, Obama, AOC, Newsom, Clinton, Gov. Pritzker, Schumer, and Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman, who himself was a victim of a politically motivated shooting–spoke out against such violence as an answer to our problems. Speaker Johnson called for a moment of silence on the House floor but a bitter shouting match ensued instead. And, talk shows, podcast, and influencers across the country all seem to have a finger to point, a point to be made, a reason, an excuse, some kind of analysis to add. But the fact remains–a man is dead.
Charlie Kirk could be my son but it isn’t just age that separates us. I don’t think I share a single political or religious philosophy with Kirk, though I, too, would call myself a Christian and a patriot. So, how is it that two people who self identify in the same way could be, in all the ways they walk out those identities, so far a part? We are blind, grabbing the “elephant” in front of us, and declaring to the world what an elephant is, despite the fact we are only using one part of an elephant–the trunk, the tail, the tusk–to inform our declarations.
A man is dead. His wife and children will need to navigate the rest of their lives without him. No one in his life woke up yesterday (9.10.25) morning thinking that by end of day he would be gone and their lives would be forever changed. From the looks of it, most Americans will not allow Charlie Kirk’s death to cause them a moment of self reflection. Many have already begun spinning it to advance their own agendas. In truth, most, if not all, who are at this moment talking about the tragedy are doing just that.
I am.
I hope, in writing this blog, I inspire a moment of engagement on the part of any who read it. I hope readers will stop their busy thoughts and ask themselves: How can I change the trajectory of our country with regard to violent solutions to our problems? How do we get off the merry-go-round of blaming and villainizing and fear mongering and land on solid ground from which we can grow in our understanding of the bigger picture and all the players?
Charlie Kirk is dead. I am not among his mourners. Yet, I pity the person who cannot see this event as a tragedy or take a moment to ask–In what piece of this did I play a part?
I could feel it coming so didn’t exactly slam into it. Even so, knowing it was coming, sensing it getting closer and closer, didn’t stop me from hitting it. When I hit, I quit. I stopped listening to my daily podcasts. I deleted Substacks from my e-mail without opening them. I stopped doom scrolling on FB. After one, maybe two posts I simply closed the tab. My own posting slowed to a crawl.






